Toyota Harrier Japan CBU Spec (240G)
There has been lots of queries with regards to the fuel consumption of the Toyota Harrier given its bulk. Well, generally, the 2nd generation Toyota Harrier comes in 2 main guises ie 240G (2AZ-FE timing chain engine) and 300G (MCU-30 timing belt engine). Both engines are used extensively in its product run-up eg Camry, Estima, Alphard and Veilfire.
As the government imposed the road tax based on the cubic capacity size in the Malaysian market, the 240G is the preferred model as its annual road tax is RM780, compared to the 300G which attracts RM2,130.
Moreover, the general maintenance of the 240G is easier on the pockets compared to 300G's V6 engine. The latter has more torque definitely, but it is also very much of a fuel guzzler if you intend to use it as a city runabout. The 240G, being commonly used in the Camry 2.4 model (from previous XV30 to current XV40), is very much a sipper compared to its more powerful variant.
240G : 158 hp, 221 Nm
300G : 216 hp, 304 Nm
Harrier : 2,235 kg dry weight
Camry : 1,430 kg dry weight
On the Camry, the 2AZ-FE moves the sedan briskly; while on the Harrier, the same 2AZ-FE has to work harder due to the extra 800kg bulk.
Now for the million dollar question : How is the fuel consumption of the Toyota Harrier 240G?
Well, not too bad at all! The official Toyota Japan website gives the fuel consumption as 11.0 litre per km, in the ideal driving environment of course. Try doing that in the real world and you'd be left wondering why is your Harrier sipping more fuel than the official nos.
Factor in the traffic jam, occassional running engine while idle, sittig inside listening to your fave track, etc, my fuel consumption was between 8.9 - 10.9 litre per km, the latter with more highway driving. Based on the few refuelings that I have had recently, the fuel consumption was as per the following :
1st refill : 21 sen per km
2nd refill : 21 sen per km
3rd refill : 19 sen per km
4th refill : 22 sen per km
As such, the average fuel consumption was in the region of 21 sen per km. Not a bad figure at all, IMHO!
Even the smaller Honda Civic's fuel consumption was in the region of 17 - 18 sen per km, so I think that the Toyota Harrier's fuel consumption is acceptable. Just don't stick in the Toyota Prius or Honda Insight for the comparison.
I bought the Harrier 300G previously because it costed the same as the Harrier 240G yet had a premium in-car DVD system. But yeah, you're right- the fuel consumption around town is much higher at about 33 - 35 sen per kilometre. The V6 engine is more suitable for highway-crusing generally. But I love the looks of our second generation Toyota Harrier!
ReplyDeleteI have the first generation Lexus RX300 with 3,000 cc V6 4WD engine (code name : MCU30). We later bought the second generation Toyota Harrier 240G Premium-L with 2,400 cc (code name : 2AZFE) when it was launched in 2004.
ReplyDeleteBoth SUVs are very reliable and comfortable, although the second generation feels more luxurious and has better NVH than the first generation. In terms of traffic light movement, the RX300 has more oomph but in city driving, the 240G triumphs by being easier to drive and has very good FC.
I own both the Beemer X5 3.0 and Toyota Harrier 240G. In terms of quietness, the X5 is better. In terms of reliability and maintenance, the 240G is definitely better. I just have to stick to the oil change every 10k mileage, and the 240G will just go on and on and on...
ReplyDeleteReadng your review, I am SOOOO trading in my Toyota Caldina GT4 for the Toyota Harrier 240G. The Caldina's FC is so bad compared to your FC figures!
ReplyDeleteAny further progress on your FC reports? My husband wants to buy a Harrier 240G and I like to know more. Heard of your site from a FB friend. We are driving a Honda Accord 2.4 and Alfa Romeo 156 2.0 TS. Do you think the FC would be comparable?
ReplyDeleteI have a 2004 Toyota Harrier 240G, and its absolutely magnificent. The fuel consumption is great considering its size and weight (managed 11.2km/L). It has a luxurious feel, and its performance isn't bad either 0-100km/h in just 10sec. I previously had the 1st generation V6 Harrier. It was extremely fast and powerful, but at the same time it was thirsty as well (managed 7.5km/L). I would advise anyone to go for the 240G Harrier. Its impressive, and will never let you down.
ReplyDeleteI Have a 2005 Toyota Harrier, the feel is exquisite and the fuel consumption is just good! Compared to my other car - BMW X5- it definitely feels like am driving on SOLAR but any way it has a great drive and FC
ReplyDeleteM.D
ReplyDeleteI just bought the 2001 Toyota Harrier 2400, V6 VVT-I engine. I'd like to know how big is the tank (how many litres its since the manual is in Japanese)
My second question, when the low petrol light comes on how many litres are left if the tank.
Thank you in adance.
I think the tank is about 67 litres
ReplyDeleteHI, I just brought 2003 model harrier 2.40g , my car fuel consumption very hight,only can managed 7km/L,Any sifu here can help me to reduce my fuel consumption,tq...
ReplyDeleteQuestion what transmission does the Toyota Harrier 2003 carry a U151E or U140E? because i am getting conflicting responses from dealerships and parts companies, since the harrier is the equivalent to the RX300 which carries a U140.
ReplyDeleteHope more input from Harrier 240G owners. My wife is soo in love with the SUV. Planning to get one soon.
ReplyDeleteplease correct ur units its km per litre not litres üer km.....was shocked at first only to understand its a typing error
ReplyDeletehye. im confusing to get new HRV or used 240g.any advise.side of financial,240g is half price of new Honda HRV.
ReplyDeleteIm getting 2009 240g harrier,im very satiesfied for fuel comsumption.
ReplyDeleteIm getting 2009 240g harrier,im very satiesfied for fuel comsumption.
ReplyDeleteGood info.
ReplyDeleteI'm buying 240g (2003)
It's good information to have . However , i like cruising and bush roads work. Is it suitable ?
ReplyDeleteim expecting to buy Harrier 2.4,i like tha shape
ReplyDeleteI am planning to buy a 2004/5 Toyota Harrier 2.4 (A) for my wife. What my worry is the reliability of a 12 years old Harrier. So my question is, would this still a good to go decision? (Under consideration of a careful ex-owner). Thanks!
ReplyDeleteI am going for the Premium L version I suppose..Anyone here knows the major difference between the other versions? Thanks.
ReplyDeleteI dont have one yet but my dream car is the harrier 2005 model in love with it
ReplyDeleteI dont have one yet but my dream car is the harrier 2005 model in love with it
ReplyDeleteI see a lot of comments but few responses to the questions. It would be nice if those who have the experience would take the time make those comments. I am considering buying a Harrier ACU 35 for my mum. Just wondering if I should go for the MCU 30 though?
ReplyDeleteThank so much for information about this SUV. I feel comfort in getting one one day
ReplyDeleteGreat information.
ReplyDeleteI am contemplating in buying a used Toyota Harrier either 2.4 or 3.0. A used Toyota Harrier 3.0 is cheaper (imported from Japan). All I have heard so far is the comparison in fuel consumption (whereas 2.4 engine is less thirsty in low speeds or when idle), is there any other difference that I should be concerned with other than FC?
I am looking to buy for cash 240G Harrier
ReplyDeletePlease whasapp me
Jas singh 006 016 2010047
Good day to everyone,
ReplyDeleteJust collected my 2009 Harrier 240G this month. Fuel consumption is averaging about 9.1km/liter for city driving.. but on the North-South highway, I was getting a maximum of 13.1km/liter at a constant 110-120km/h.
Tyre pressure at 230kPa (23psi).
Ron95
Btw, u can turn off the beeping seat belt sound :) good for around the taman driving, but always remember to use the seat belt.
Update: A 11.5 to 12.1km/liter at a constant 110-120km/h is a more realistic figure after more than 10 trips on KL-Malacca highway.
DeleteSo city drive full tank can go for about 650km and highway about 792km? Using ron95 or ron97?
DeleteI am planning to buy a 2004/5 Toyota Harrier 2.4 (A) or 3.0.What my worry is the reliability of a 12 years old Harrier, maintance & etc . So my question is, would this still a good to go decision for 12 yrs old car ? 2.4 or 3.0 ?
ReplyDeleteThinking of 2005-2007 240G Harrier to upgrade my premio 1999 of approx 8 years of usage sooner, I would prefer the 4WD, but getting some offers for a 2WDs, what are the real disadvantages of 2WD, my movement of off road is less than 5% on monthly basis?
ReplyDeleteJust bought a 2005 240G Premium L with 132,000km on the clock for RM40K OTR. For a 15 year old SUV, it is an amazing ride. No squeaks or rattles, Fantastic NVH treatment by the manufacturer. The leather seats are in great shape as is the rest of the trim. The engine purrs softly and shifts are smooth.
ReplyDeleteThe only thing Ive changed is the ignition - from key to push start. And yes, upgraded the headunit to include touchscreen Bluetooth to enable handsfree telephone etc.
Checks at the local Toyota for a full health check revealed
Recently bought a used Toyota Harrier 240G with about 111000km on the mileage. The car was averaging around 7.1km/l even on the highway. So I took the car for service since I had just bought it and found that it had a broken coil pack and oxygen sensor. I managed to replace the coil pack and the usual maintenance stuff and the car has noticeable improved fuel efficiency. It's now around 9km/l. I'm hopeful that cahnging the oxygen sensor will also improve the fuel economy to something like 10km/l. Overally this is a nice car, it's comfortable, it's roomy and I was have people turning there eyes looking at it.
ReplyDeletebos... i borrow your photos for my FB post
ReplyDeletehttps://www.facebook.com/hasmadihadi858